New planning proposals will fail to protect nature

Today the Government announced the publication of a White Paper, Planning for the Future.

Warwickshire Wildlife Trust believes there are fundamental flaws in the current planning system because it has allowed huge declines in the natural world – and the proposed reform of the process will make a bad situation much worse.

Warwickshire Wildlife Trust is seriously concerned regarding the recent proposed changes to the planning system through the Government’s consultation document - ‘White Paper, Planning for the Future’.

Jennie Johnson, Planning and Biodiversity Officer at Warwickshire Wildlife Trust says: "We have a number of concerns regarding the new proposals, specifically rushing the process and not engaging environmental bodies in full. As well as making it easier to build on brownfield sites, which covers a significant area in Warwickshire and often become important sites for flora and fauna and for protected species. We are concerned regarding changes to the Community Infrastructure Fund, which may reduce the amount of biodiversity offsetting funds available locally in Warwickshire. Housing plans would also be rushed through, rather than have a thorough consultation that engaged the local environmental groups and fully considered the wider impact on the local environment and biodiversity."

"Warwickshire has an important network of green spaces and living landscapes which we work hard to promote and enhance. Speeding up and simplifying the planning process could mean that important assessments and proposals are rushed through, resulting in long term impacts on wider green infrastructure."

"While we support the preservation of valued green spaces, the Green Belt, encouragement of tree lined streets, as well as all new homes to be ‘zero carbon ready’, there’s already a high development pressure in Warwickshire. There are therefore serious concerns regarding allowing ‘Permission in principle’ on major developments, new allocation categories to speed up the process and ‘Renewal areas’ which would lead to development being rushed without protected species being fully considered and nature networks and important local wildlife sites being overlooked."

"We live in one of the most nature-depleted countries in the world. The White Paper proposes a planning system with three categories of land – earmarked for growth, renewal and protection – but this simplification brings the risk of creating a disconnected landscape, one in which wildlife continues to decline because nature doesn’t slot into neat little boxes. Protecting isolated fragments of land is not enough to help wildlife recover, nor will it put nature into people’s lives – something that is now recognised as vital for our health and wellbeing.”
Nikki Williams, Director of Campaigning and Policy
The Wildlife Trusts
Alvecote Meadows Pond and housing in the background

Sue Steward, New Leaf images

The Wildlife Trusts care for 250,000 acres across 2,300 nature reserves and advise on how a further half a million acres are managed. We improve vast areas for nature – as well as protecting thousands of acres through influencing planning decisions each year.  While protecting important green areas is vital – and it is time that National Parks, AONBs and the green belt became better for wildlife – we also know that most wildlife is found outside existing protected areas and so reversing wildlife decline has to happen everywhere.

Nikki Williams continues:

“It’s critical that government weaves nature into the heart of every housing development, old and new. Government proposals for ‘tree-lined streets’ are nothing like enough. Parks, green spaces and all the areas around our homes must be part of a wild network of nature-rich areas that will benefit bees and birds as much as they will enable people to connect with on-your-doorstep nature every single day. ​This is essential if we are to tackle the twin climate and biodiversity crises as well as provide homes that people want to live in surrounded by beautiful, buzzing green spaces.

“The Government may find it inconvenient that wildlife won’t stick to its three categories and survives outside protected areas, as well as thriving on some brownfield sites that it would like to see developed. So the new growth and renewal areas must benefit wildlife too. The Government ​should ensure every department now heeds its own proposed Environment Bill and 25 Year Environment Plan, and integrates a Nature Recovery Network through all future development. Local authorities will have to be far better resourced with access to high-quality ecological data, so that they can ​spatially plan where and how new development happens.”  

The Wildlife Trusts believe the ability of local people to have their say must not be reduced – instead, it is important that the voice of local communities is heard louder than ever so that affordable housing can be surrounded by wild spaces, clean air and healthier surroundings to realise the government ambition for 'higher regard on quality and design than ever before."*

MHCLG suggest that they want to extend exceptions to paying s106 contributions. Those funds are often crucial in protecting local wildlife sites and nature against the impacts from new developments, and exemptions should only be extended if it is alongside proposals for better avoidance of impacts.

The Wildlife Trusts work with national and local government, businesses and local communities to influence planning and development to achieve better outcomes for wildlife. The Wildlife Trusts respond to around 6,500 planning applications per year, and tens of thousands more are vetted and checked for impacts on wildlife.

Nature-rich housing developments, designed with environmental sensitivity and green infrastructure at their heart, can provide people with easy access to nature where they live and work and deliver multiple social, environmental and economic benefits. 

Research shows that time spent in nature is good for you and there are many studies that show the links between access to nature and better health. Research also shows that urban living with little or no contact with nature can increase physical and mental health problems. Nature too is suffering; urban development is a significant factor in the continuing loss of wildlife and wild spaces.

Homes for people and wildlife
Homes for People and Wildlife

A Wildlife Trust report on how to build housing in a nature-friendly way

Read now

Editor’s notes

*Robert Jenrick, Housing Minister, writing in the Telegraph 1st August 2020.

Spatial planning is essential to help nature recover

Local Nature Recovery Network Maps, developed in partnership, which identify accurately where existing wildlife habitats are now and where they should be in future to sustain a healthy, diverse natural world that is rich in wildlife and brings significant benefit to society.  [Draft Environment Bill Clause 97 (3)]